|
States of Equality Scorecard
Are you a second class citizen in your own state? Review state by state comparisons of the score on equality and gay rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans.
The score indicates the number of Equality Goals that have been reached in that state. Each "YES" gives 1 point. Half a point is given for partial achievement of an Equality Goal. One of the seven Equality Goals (repealing "Don't Ask Don't Tell") is mostly a federal level goal. Therefore, at the state level, the maximum score is 6.
Click on any heading to sort table. Highest possible score is 6.0.
STATE
|
SCORE
|
HATE CRIMES |
NON DISCRIMINATION
|
MARRIAGE
|
GENDER
|
YOUTH |
PARENTING
|
ALABAMA
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
|
ALASKA
|
2.0 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
ARIZONA
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Not tested
|
ARKANSAS
|
1.5 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
NO |
CALIFORNIA
|
5.5
|
YES |
YES |
Domestic
Partnerships |
YES |
YES |
YES |
COLORADO
|
3.5
|
YES |
YES |
Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Second Parent Adoption |
CONNECTICUT
|
5.0
|
YES |
Only sexual orientation |
YES |
YES |
Only sexual orientation |
YES |
DELAWARE
|
3.0 |
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Second Parent Adoption |
|
DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
|
5.0
|
YES |
YES |
YES |
Amended
certificate |
Only sexual orientation |
YES |
FLORIDA
|
1.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
NO |
GEORGIA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Not tested
|
HAWAI'I
|
3.5 |
YES |
Only sexual orientation
|
Domestic Reciprocal Beneficiaries |
YES |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
IDAHO
|
1.5 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
Not tested |
ILLINOIS
|
4.0 |
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
YES |
NO |
YES |
NO |
YES |
INDIANA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
No gender in certificate |
NO |
Partial
|
IOWA
|
5.5
|
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
Some Jurisdictions
|
KANSAS
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Not tested |
KENTUCKY
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Not tested |
LOUISIANA
|
2.5 |
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
MAINE
|
4.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
YES |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
YES |
Only Joint adoption |
MARYLAND
|
4.0 |
YES |
Only sexual orientation |
Recognizes
marriages |
Amended
certificate
|
YES |
Some Jurisdictions |
MASSACHUSETTS
|
4.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation |
YES |
Amended
certificate |
Only sexual orientation |
YES |
MICHIGAN
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Second Parent Adoption |
MINNESOTA
|
4.0
|
YES |
YES |
NO |
Decided by Court order |
YES |
Some Jurisdictions |
MISSISSIPPI
|
1.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
NO |
MISSOURI
|
2.0
|
YES |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Not tested
|
MONTANA
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Decided by Court order |
NO |
Not tested
|
NEBRASKA
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
NO |
NEVADA
|
3.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation |
Domestic Partnerships |
YES |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions |
NEW HAMPSHIRE
|
3.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation
|
YES |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions |
NEW JERSEY
|
5.5
|
YES |
YES |
Civil Unions
|
YES |
YES |
YES |
NEW MEXICO
|
3.0
|
YES |
YES |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
NEW YORK
|
4.0
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation |
Recognizes marriages |
YES |
NO |
YES |
NORTH CAROLINA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Not tested
|
NORTH DAKOTA
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Not tested
|
OHIO
|
1.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
Not tested Joint Adoption
|
OKLAHOMA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Not tested
|
OREGON
|
4.0 |
YES |
YES |
Domestic Partnerships |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
YES |
PENNSYLVANIA
|
2.0
|
YES |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Second Parent Adoption |
RHODE ISLAND
|
3.0 |
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
YES |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
SOUTH CAROLINA
|
2.0 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Not tested
|
SOUTH DAKOTA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Not tested
|
TENNESSEE
|
1.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
NO |
NO |
Not tested
|
TEXAS
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
NO |
NO |
Depends on Clerk |
NO |
Some Jurisdictions
|
UTAH
|
2.0
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
NO |
VERMONT
|
5.5
|
YES |
YES |
YES |
Amended
certificate
|
YES |
YES |
VIRGINIA
|
2.5
|
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
YES |
NO |
Not tested
|
WASHINGTON
|
4.0
|
YES |
YES |
Domestic Partnerships
|
Amended
certificate
|
Only sexual orientation |
Some Jurisdictions |
WEST VIRGINIA
|
2.0 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate
|
NO |
Not tested |
WISCONSIN
|
3.0 |
FEDERAL (state covers sexual orientation) |
Only sexual orientation |
NO |
Decided by Court order |
Only sexual orientation
|
Not fully tested
|
| WYOMING |
2.0 |
FEDERAL |
NO |
NO |
Amended
certificate |
NO |
Not tested
|
NOTES
- Each column refers to an Equality Goal. Check here for more information on them.
- The Gender column refers specifically to the freedom of choosing your own gender. As such it focuses of the laws of different states regarding birth certificates. Other gender identity issues are addressed in the proper column. For instance, in Hate Crimes and Employment a state can only get a full score if they include gender identity.
- The Youth column focuses on whether the state has non-bullying statues that specifically enumerate sexual orientation and gender identity. If a state has non-bullying statues that do not enumerate sexual orientation and/or gender identity, we do not give any credit, because according to GLSEN's research, "these statutes provide no more benefit to LGBT students than not having any law at all." There 27 such states without enumeration: Alabama (which uses the term harassment instead of bullying), Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming. Furthermore, some states provide policies through the Department of Education; GLSEN is investigating the effectiveness of these policies vs. state statues; after the results of this research are known, we will give credit to a state as appropriate.
ANALYSIS (50 states + District of Columbia):
- No state provides full equality to the LGBTQ population (i.e., a score of 6).
- Four states: California, Iowa, New Jersey, and Vermont, achieve a rating of 5.5 out of 6. California and New Jersey can achieve the perfect score of 6 by converting civil unions (New Jersey) or domestic partnerships (California) to civil marriage. Iowa can reach a score of 6 by ensuring full parenting rights in all cases. Vermont can achieve a score of 6 by protecting the transgender population more (in particular: do not show "amended" birth certificates when changing gender).
- One other state (Connecticut) and the District of Columbia scores 5 out 6.
- Massachusetts scores only 4.5 despite that if offers marriage equality. This is because it falls short in transgender protections in hate crimes, non discrimination, anti-bullying, and providing new birth certificates. (With the enactment of the Federal Hate Crimes Act, Massachusetts rating increased from 4.0 to 4.5 as the state legislation only offered hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation only.)
- Passing federal legislation on an Equality Goal would increase every state score by 1.
THE IMPACT OF FEDERAL HATE CRIMES LEGISLATION
The signing of the federal Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act by President Obama on October 28, 2009 marked the achievement of our first Equality Goal.
The chart to the right shows the rating of states from zero to the maximum of 6 before the enactment of the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
Fifty percent of the states satisfied none or just one of the 6Equality Goals that are required to ensure that LGBTQ people have thesame legal protections as everyone else.
Prior to this federal legislation out of 50 states plus the District of Columbia:
- 19 states did not have legislation protecting against hate crimes based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression
- 17 states had only hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation
- 14 states and the District of Columbia had had hate crimes protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression
After the enactment of this federal legislation all states and the District of Columbia are covered by the Hate Prevention Act based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression.
Note that the number of states with a score of 5 has not changed (there are only five such states: California, Iowa, New Jersey and Vermont with a score of 5.5 and Connecticut with 5.0). All of these states already offered already hate crimes protection for sexual orientation and gender identity/expression.
Because of passing the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the number of states with very few protections for LGBT people has improved. Before the Act, fifty percent of the states satisfied none or only one of the Equality Goals; now all states satisfy at least one goal, but ten percent of the states provided little more (they are: Arkansas, Idaho, Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee).
Check our LGBT directory of organizations working to achieve equality. Each organization is represented by a major donor explaining why he or she is so committed to the organization.
RESULTS FROM THE QUIZ
The people who took the Equal and Gay Quiz, as a group had a tendency to underestimate the actual score in their state by about 1 point out of 6 as the chart indicates.
So, the good news is that most states offer slightly more equality than the average person who took the test estimated. The bad news is that the state of equality in the United States is unacceptable with half of the states offering none or 1 of the six equal protections that all other citizens enjoy.
RECENT HISTORY
- On October 28, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
- On November 4, 2008 voters placed a constitutional ban on marriages in Arizona, California, and Florida. Arizona and Florida already had laws prohibiting same-sex marriages. But, in California same-sex couples had a constitutional right to marry; this right was taken away by voters.
- On October 10, 2008 the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the civil unions that the legislature approved for the state violated the Connecticut constitution and the state had to provide marriage to same-sex couples. But the federal government still does not recognize those marriages and does not allow to serve openly in the military. On November 4, 2008 voters rejected a call to have a Constitutional Convention in Connecticut. Therefore, the right to marry is secure in Connecticut (like in Massachusetts).
- On May 15, 2008 the California Supreme Court approved marriage equality for same sex couples. California become the first state to offer full equality to the LGBTQ population. There is a ballot initiative on November 2008 to try to overturn this ruling. Everybody's support is critical.
- In May 2008, the Florida legislature passed anti-bullying legislation (but it does not enumerate protected clasees)
- In May 2008, Maryland become the 7th state with anti-bullying legislation that specifically protects youth because of their sexual orientation and gender identity/expression
|
|
|
|
|
|