eQualityGiving logo Equality Giving

Equality Goals Priorities

What are the priorities for achieving the Equality Goals?  What do you think? What can be achieved in the next two years?

 

WHAT A SURVEY SHOWS

A survey conducted by Patrick Egan, Murray Edelman, and Kenneth Sherrill presents new discoveries about LGB identity, political attitudes, and civic engagement (pdf file). Among the many interesting results, note the priorities for LGB rights by age (see chart below), as well as by the level of information of the people taking the survey (second chart). The rights that they highlight match the Equality Goals (with the addition of AIDS funding). Note that their survey did not include transgender individuals. Our Equality Goals and eQualityGiving are transgender inclusive.

 

equality gay rights priorities

equality gay rights priorities by level of information

 

 

WHAT CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS

Beyond the wishes expressed in this survey, what is politically achievable?  By when?

We believe that all Equality Goals are achievable in a few years---and several of them within the next two years. The order in which they can be achieved depends on a multitude of factors. 

What we can expect:

  •  Passage of an inclusive Hate Crimes bill and signed into law in the first six months of 2009.
     
  • Passage of the Employment Non Discrimination Act and signed into bill in the first six months of 2009. If the community remains united, this bill can, and should, be inclusive of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression.
     
  • Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell by early 2010.
     
  • Repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act by early 2010. The community will have to fight to ensure that the whole DOMA is repealed.
     
  • Passage of legislation to provide equality to all married couples, whether heterosexual or homosexual. Repeal of DOMA is not enough and several federal statues need also to be changed since some rights and obligations of marriage at the federal level depend on the marriage to be legal in the state where the couple resides, not where the marriage took place.
  • Passage of federal anti-bullying/anti-harassment legislation to keep schools safe for all students and enumerating, in particular, sexual orientation and gender identity and expression.
  • Marriage equality is likely to advance significantly in the next 2 years. Several states are very likely to pass legislation for marriage equality in 2009. All the states in New England are expected to pass legislation for marriage equality in the next four years.

All of these gains will only come through a clear understanding of the political and legal process and our willingness to invest the time and money to affect it. This includes electing pro equality candidates at the federal, state, and local levels as well as educating conservative Democrat and moderate Republican elected officials about voting for equality (and reassuring them that their seats are not in jeopardy for voting that way --- or, alternatively, that we are committed to defeat elected officials who are anti equality).

 

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Your thoughtful comments about strategy are welcome below. 

 

 

Home >> Equality Goals Priorities (top)

CLICK to email this page to your list

POST AND PARTICIPATE [how to post]

Click to Post
From Barbara McCullough-Jones [72.222.131.22] - Jun. 19, 2008 11:48 PM

I am curious to see the list of issues divided by gender identity - with a subset of gender identity and age. As others have posted the glaring lack of trans-inclusion stands in stark contrast to calling the results an LGBT poll.

Further, while the list represents public policy issues it does not explore the "internal" issues that continue to plague our movement such as racism, sexism, economic diversity and apathy. Seems like the survey "skimmed the cream" but didn't dip deep enough to root out the issues that are our biggest challenges to equality.

Quite frankly from one that works from inside the fire, I know our movement needs resources and support to overcome those challenges in order to move forward together. Not a sexy part of the movement but one than when left to fester costs us dearly - in leadership, in re-inventing the wheel and in missing those moments when a strong rapid response capacity should already exist in part because we have built allies across a variety of issues and are inclusive of the entire LGBT and allied communities.


From danabeyer - Jun. 17, 2008 7:37 PM

What I find interesting is that if this is, indeed, just a poll of the LGB population (and I would imagine there are very few "B"s here as well), then the low support for trans rights is strikingly poor compared to that of the general population. Straight folks, either in national surveys or in a recent Maryland survey, support trans rights in the range of 65%. That includes the full range of civil rights -- employment, housing, accommodations -- and hate crimes protections/bullying as well. If the gay community is only half as supportive, that would be pretty shameful, and I don't see how we can rationalize that as inadequate education. Gay folks are far better educated on trans issues than straight ones.


From Sabrina Schnur [72.23.141.51] - Jun. 12, 2008 9:45 AM

I would like to know why you stated in your heading, and I quote

 "presents new discoveries about LGBT identity, political attitudes, and civic engagement (pdf file). Among the many interesting results, note the priorities for LGBT rights by age (see chart below)". 

I reviewed this PDF and even though you stated in the begining it was a LGBT report, the transgender community was deliberately excluded from this study. 

I particularly enjoyed Figure 7 & 8 in the study " Priorities for LGBT Rights"  that shows how little the LGB community that responded, cares about Transgenders rights. 

I don't get the idea that the organization state their LGBT but when it comes right down to it, it seems that the Trans community is the "unwanted, red headed, stepchild" of the group. 

Please don't take my comments as a personal atack, but I would love to know why I shouldn't feel betray by the organization that I support because they're "fully inclusive" in the LGBT community, then to be disappointed by their action and lack of support to ALL the member of the community they say they represent.

.6HDBHDEDJG.@BH.'*4,.5DN>EG


From Jim Toevs [206.183.124.161] - Jun. 12, 2008 8:54 AM

Polls provide valuable information to help us understand where we are, but we fail in our job if we simply go with the most popular issues.

 The low priority given to transgender rights shows that the GLB Community holds attitudes towards the equality of others, not unlike the attitudes of other minorities:  until their own rights have been achieved, the rights of others are not a high priority; and after their own rights have been achieved, who cares?   What this indicates to me is that we have a lot of educating to do in our own community about why trans-inclusiveness is important.

 From a strategic standpoint, the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" would be a HUGE leap forward in our quest for full legal equality in our lifetime.  Just as Truman's ending of segregation in the military brought millions of white military personnel into contact with black people, so the ending of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" will bring millions of non-gay military personnel into contact with members of the GLBT Community.  As we know, when people know that they know someone LBGT, it dramatically increases their support for our equality.


From CharlesMerrill - Jun. 12, 2008 5:14 AM

Marriage equality is the number one issue because it is about a citizens contitutional guarantee of "Equal justice under the law."  Even if you are a swinging single and hate the insitution of marriage, the fight is about justice.

Marriage between “gender neutral” couples is legal in California, and we are still fighting.  Give to equalityforall.com.  Our unions are not recognized by the Federal government and we don’t get the over 1,000 Federal benefits automatically extended to heterosexual couples. This inequality, thanks to the Defense of Marriage Act, was voted on by congress and signed into law by President Clinton. What a can of worms that has turned out to be. President Bush believing in and guided by an imaginary sky god's "sanctity of marriage" to initiate an amendment to our Constitution that would ban two people in love from getting married. The government has no business in checking out the gender of two people who apply for marriage.

On the list of top priorities should be, separation of church and state and equal marriage rights, a continuing battle worth fighting for, we, as citizens of the United States.


Site

Search
Index

User

Login
Register

 
 

Last Modified 2009-04-30